Versa Networks Vs Palo Alto Networks: Comprehensive 2026 Security Platform Comparison

The cybersecurity landscape continues evolving rapidly in 2026, making the choice between network security providers more critical than ever. Organizations seeking robust SD-WAN and SASE solutions often find themselves choosing between two industry leaders: Versa Networks and Palo Alto Networks. Both companies offer comprehensive security platforms, but their approaches, strengths, and target markets differ significantly.

This detailed comparison examines every aspect of both platforms. We’ll analyze their security effectiveness, deployment models, pricing structures, and performance metrics. Understanding these differences helps organizations make informed decisions about their network security infrastructure. The stakes are high, as the wrong choice can impact security posture, operational efficiency, and total cost of ownership for years to come.

Company Background and Market Position

Palo Alto Networks established itself as a cybersecurity pioneer since 2005. The company revolutionized network security with next-generation firewalls and comprehensive threat intelligence. Today, Palo Alto Networks serves over 85,000 customers worldwide, ranging from small businesses to Fortune 500 enterprises.

Their platform encompasses cloud security, endpoint protection, and network security solutions. Palo Alto Networks went public in 2012 and has consistently grown through strategic acquisitions. The company’s Prisma SASE platform represents their latest evolution in secure access service edge technology.

Versa Networks emerged in 2012 with a cloud-native approach to network security. The company focused specifically on SD-WAN and SASE solutions from inception. Versa Networks built their platform with cloud-first architecture, addressing modern enterprises’ distributed workforce needs.

Despite being newer, Versa Networks has gained recognition for innovation and security effectiveness. Gartner acknowledges Versa Networks as a strong performer in multiple Magic Quadrant reports. The company serves mid-market and enterprise customers seeking unified networking and security solutions.

Market Recognition and Industry Standing

Both companies receive consistent recognition from industry analysts. However, their positions reflect different strengths and market focus areas.

• Palo Alto Networks: Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant for Network Firewalls
• Palo Alto Networks: Strong performer in SASE market analysis
• Versa Networks: Visionary in Gartner Magic Quadrant for SD-WAN
• Versa Networks: High security effectiveness ratings in independent testing

Security Effectiveness and Threat Protection Capabilities

Security effectiveness remains the primary concern for organizations evaluating these platforms. Independent testing reveals significant insights about both solutions’ threat detection and prevention capabilities.

Versa Networks demonstrated the highest security effectiveness, making them the most reliable options for blocking exploits and evasion tactics. This recognition comes from rigorous third-party testing that evaluates real-world threat scenarios.

Threat Intelligence and Detection Methods

Palo Alto Networks leverages WildFire threat intelligence, one of the industry’s most comprehensive threat databases. Their approach combines signature-based detection with machine learning algorithms. The platform analyzes millions of samples daily, creating dynamic protection against emerging threats.

WildFire integrates with all Palo Alto Networks security products. This integration ensures consistent threat visibility across the entire security stack. Organizations benefit from unified threat intelligence that improves detection accuracy and reduces false positives.

Versa Networks employs a multi-layered security approach that includes advanced threat detection engines. Their platform combines traditional security methods with innovative cloud-native techniques. The solution provides real-time threat analysis and automated response capabilities.

Performance in Security Testing

Independent security testing reveals important performance differences between these platforms. Versa Networks consistently scores higher in exploit blocking and evasion resistance tests.

SD-WAN Architecture and Network Performance

SD-WAN capabilities form the foundation of modern enterprise networking strategies. Both platforms offer comprehensive SD-WAN solutions, but their architectural approaches differ significantly.

Versa Networks SD-WAN Architecture

Versa Networks built their SD-WAN solution with cloud-native principles from the ground up. Their architecture eliminates the need for traditional hardware appliances in many deployments. The platform supports full software-defined networking across diverse connection types.

The solution provides dynamic path selection based on application requirements and network conditions. Organizations can prioritize critical applications while optimizing bandwidth utilization. Advanced quality of service features ensure consistent performance for voice, video, and data traffic.

Versa’s architecture supports hybrid and multi-cloud environments seamlessly. Integration with major cloud providers enables direct connectivity and optimized performance. This approach reduces latency and improves user experience for cloud-based applications.

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

Palo Alto Networks offers SD-WAN capabilities through their Prisma Access platform. Their approach integrates SD-WAN with comprehensive security services in a unified solution. The platform leverages CloudGenix technology acquired in 2020.

Prisma SD-WAN provides application-aware routing and dynamic path optimization. The solution automatically adapts to network conditions and application requirements. Machine learning algorithms continuously optimize performance based on historical data and usage patterns.

Security integration remains Palo Alto Networks’ key differentiator. Their SD-WAN solution includes built-in firewall, intrusion prevention, and advanced threat protection. This integration eliminates the need for separate security appliances at branch locations.

Performance Comparison in Real-World Deployments

Real-world performance metrics reveal important differences between these SD-WAN solutions. Organizations report varying experiences based on their specific requirements and deployment scenarios.

• Latency Optimization: Versa Networks typically achieves 15-20% lower latency
• Bandwidth Efficiency: Both platforms provide similar bandwidth optimization
• Application Performance: Palo Alto Networks offers slightly better Microsoft 365 optimization
• Branch Deployment Speed: Versa Networks enables faster zero-touch provisioning

SASE Platform Capabilities and Cloud Integration

Secure Access Service Edge represents the future of enterprise networking and security. Both vendors offer comprehensive SASE platforms, but their implementation strategies and capabilities vary considerably.

Versa SASE Platform Overview

Versa SASE delivers a truly converged networking and security platform. The solution combines SD-WAN, firewall, secure web gateway, and zero trust network access in a single offering. Organizations can deploy the entire platform through cloud-delivered services or hybrid models.

The platform’s cloud-native architecture enables rapid scaling and global reach. Versa operates points of presence worldwide, ensuring low-latency access for distributed users. Advanced traffic steering optimizes performance while maintaining security policy enforcement.

Zero trust principles are embedded throughout the Versa SASE platform. Every connection requires authentication and authorization, regardless of user location or device type. Continuous monitoring and adaptive policies ensure ongoing security compliance.

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access SASE

Prisma Access represents Palo Alto Networks’ comprehensive SASE offering. The platform leverages the company’s extensive security expertise and global cloud infrastructure. Integration with existing Palo Alto Networks products provides unified management and policy enforcement.

The solution serves over 100 locations worldwide through Palo Alto Networks’ cloud infrastructure. This extensive presence ensures consistent performance and security for global organizations. Advanced traffic engineering optimizes application delivery while maintaining security posture.

Prisma Access integrates deeply with Microsoft 365 and other cloud applications. Optimized connectors provide enhanced performance for popular SaaS platforms. This integration reduces complexity while improving user experience for cloud-based workflows.

Cloud Integration Capabilities Comparison

Cloud integration capabilities determine how effectively each platform supports modern enterprise requirements. Both solutions offer strong cloud connectivity, but their approaches differ.

Management Platform and User Experience Analysis

Management complexity significantly impacts operational efficiency and total cost of ownership. Both platforms provide comprehensive management tools, but their approaches to user experience and operational simplicity differ substantially.

Versa Director Management Platform

Versa Director provides centralized management for all Versa Networks solutions. The platform offers intuitive dashboards that simplify complex network and security operations. Single-pane-of-glass visibility reduces operational overhead and improves response times.

The management interface emphasizes automation and self-service capabilities. Organizations can implement policy changes across their entire infrastructure through simple workflows. Advanced analytics provide insights into network performance, security posture, and user behavior.

API integration enables seamless connection with existing IT management tools. Organizations can incorporate Versa management functions into their established operational procedures. This integration reduces training requirements and accelerates deployment timelines.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Prisma Access Management

Panorama serves as Palo Alto Networks’ central management platform for their security portfolio. The solution provides comprehensive visibility and control across firewalls, SASE services, and cloud security tools. Unified policy management ensures consistent security enforcement.

The platform includes advanced reporting and compliance features that meet enterprise requirements. Automated policy recommendations help organizations optimize their security posture. Machine learning capabilities identify potential configuration issues before they impact operations.

Prisma Access includes specialized management tools optimized for SASE deployments. The interface simplifies complex networking and security configurations through guided workflows. Real-time monitoring provides visibility into global user experience and application performance.

Operational Complexity and Learning Curve

User feedback reveals important differences in operational complexity between these platforms. Organizations report varying experiences based on their existing expertise and infrastructure complexity.

• Initial Setup Time: Versa Networks typically requires 2-3 weeks less deployment time
• Training Requirements: Palo Alto Networks requires more specialized security expertise
• Day-to-Day Operations: Versa SASE receives higher ease-of-use ratings
• Troubleshooting: Both platforms provide comprehensive diagnostic tools

Customer Satisfaction and User Reviews

Customer feedback provides valuable insights into real-world experiences with both platforms. Review aggregation sites and analyst reports reveal consistent patterns in user satisfaction across different deployment scenarios.

G2 and Gartner Review Analysis

Multiple review platforms show strong satisfaction rates for both vendors, with some notable differences in specific areas. Reviewers felt that Versa SASE meets the needs of their business better than Palo Alto Networks Panorama. This feedback comes from organizations that have evaluated both solutions in their specific environments.

Palo Alto Networks receives consistently high ratings across multiple product categories. Their established market presence and comprehensive security portfolio attract positive feedback from enterprise customers. However, some users cite complexity and cost concerns in their reviews.

Versa Networks demonstrates strong satisfaction rates, particularly among organizations prioritizing ease of use and deployment speed. Customers frequently highlight the platform’s intuitive management interface and responsive customer support as key differentiators.

Review Ratings Breakdown

Common Praise and Criticism Themes

Review analysis reveals consistent themes in customer feedback for both platforms. Understanding these patterns helps organizations set appropriate expectations for their deployments.

Palo Alto Networks – Common Praise:

• Comprehensive security feature set
• Strong threat intelligence and protection
• Excellent integration with existing security tools
• Mature platform with proven enterprise scalability

Palo Alto Networks – Common Criticisms:

• Complex initial configuration and ongoing management
• Higher total cost of ownership
• Steep learning curve for new administrators
• Occasional performance issues with complex policies

Versa Networks – Common Praise:

• Intuitive management interface and workflows
• Rapid deployment and configuration capabilities
• Excellent customer support and responsiveness
• Strong price-to-performance ratio

Versa Networks – Common Criticisms:

• Smaller ecosystem of third-party integrations
• Less established brand recognition in some markets
• Occasional feature gaps compared to specialized solutions
• Limited availability of local support in some regions

Pricing Models and Total Cost of Ownership

Cost considerations play a crucial role in platform selection decisions. Both vendors offer multiple pricing models designed to accommodate different organizational requirements and deployment scenarios.

Versa Networks Pricing Structure

Versa Networks employs a subscription-based pricing model that scales with bandwidth and feature requirements. The company offers transparent pricing that includes all core networking and security features. Organizations can start with basic packages and expand capabilities as requirements grow.

The pricing structure includes several tiers designed for different organizational sizes and complexity levels. Entry-level packages provide essential SD-WAN and security features suitable for small to mid-size deployments. Enterprise packages include advanced analytics, automation, and support services.

Versa Networks typically offers more competitive pricing for organizations seeking comprehensive SASE capabilities. Their cloud-native architecture reduces infrastructure costs and simplifies ongoing operations. Organizations report 20-30% lower total cost of ownership compared to traditional solutions.

Palo Alto Networks Pricing Approach

Palo Alto Networks utilizes a modular pricing approach that allows organizations to purchase specific components based on requirements. Prisma Access pricing scales with user count and bandwidth consumption. Additional security services require separate licensing fees.

The company offers both hardware and software-based licensing options. Hardware appliances require upfront capital expenditure plus ongoing support costs. Software licenses provide more flexibility but may result in higher long-term costs for large deployments.

Enterprise licensing agreements provide volume discounts and standardized pricing across the Palo Alto Networks portfolio. These agreements often include training, professional services, and premium support options. However, total costs typically exceed alternative solutions for similar capabilities.

Cost Comparison Analysis

Total cost of ownership analysis must consider multiple factors beyond initial licensing fees. Implementation costs, ongoing support, training, and operational overhead significantly impact long-term expenses.

Deployment Scenarios and Use Case Analysis

Different organizations have varying requirements that favor one platform over another. Understanding optimal deployment scenarios helps organizations align their selection with specific business needs and technical constraints.

Ideal Versa Networks Deployment Scenarios

Versa Networks excels in scenarios requiring rapid deployment and simplified management. Organizations with distributed workforces and cloud-first strategies benefit significantly from Versa’s architecture. The platform particularly suits mid-market companies seeking enterprise-grade capabilities without complexity overhead.

Retail organizations with numerous branch locations find Versa’s zero-touch provisioning particularly valuable. The ability to deploy new sites quickly and efficiently reduces operational overhead and accelerates business expansion. Centralized management eliminates the need for specialized IT staff at each location.

Healthcare organizations benefit from Versa’s compliance features and simplified security policy management. The platform’s unified approach reduces the complexity of maintaining HIPAA compliance across distributed environments. Advanced analytics provide insights into potential security and performance issues.

Optimal Palo Alto Networks Use Cases

Palo Alto Networks serves organizations with complex security requirements and existing security infrastructure investments. Large enterprises with dedicated security teams benefit from the platform’s comprehensive feature set and integration capabilities. Industries with strict compliance requirements appreciate the mature security controls.

Financial services organizations often prefer Palo Alto Networks for their advanced threat protection and established security reputation. The platform’s threat intelligence capabilities and incident response tools meet stringent regulatory requirements. Integration with security information and event management systems provides comprehensive visibility.

Government agencies and defense contractors frequently select Palo Alto Networks for classified and sensitive deployments. The company’s security clearances and specialized government solutions address unique requirements. Advanced threat protection capabilities defend against sophisticated nation-state attacks.

Hybrid Deployment Considerations

Some organizations consider hybrid deployments that leverage strengths from both platforms. These scenarios typically involve complex requirements that no single vendor addresses comprehensively.

• Geographic Considerations: Different regions may favor different vendors based on local support
• Acquisition Integration: Merged organizations may temporarily operate multiple platforms
• Risk Mitigation: Multi-vendor strategies reduce dependency on single suppliers
• Feature Gaps: Specialized requirements may necessitate best-of-breed approaches

Integration Capabilities and Ecosystem Partnerships

Modern enterprise environments require extensive integration with existing tools and third-party services. Both platforms provide integration capabilities, but their ecosystem partnerships and API maturity levels differ significantly.

Versa Networks Integration Ecosystem

Versa Networks focuses on core integrations that address the most common enterprise requirements. Their API framework enables connection with major IT service management platforms and monitoring solutions. The company prioritizes deep integration over broad ecosystem coverage.

Cloud provider integrations receive particular attention in Versa’s ecosystem strategy. Native connections with AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform optimize performance and simplify deployment. These integrations eliminate the need for complex routing configurations and improve application performance.

Security tool integrations include major SIEM platforms and threat intelligence services. Organizations can forward security events and logs to their existing security operations centers. API access enables custom integrations for specialized requirements not covered by standard connectors.

Palo Alto Networks Partnership Strategy

Palo Alto Networks maintains an extensive ecosystem of technology partnerships and integrations. The company’s established market position attracts integration partnerships with major enterprise software vendors. Comprehensive API documentation enables custom integrations and third-party application development.

The Palo Alto Networks Technology Partner Program includes over 300 certified integrations. These partnerships cover security, networking, cloud, and enterprise application categories. Standardized integration frameworks ensure consistent functionality across partner solutions.

Application marketplace provides pre-built integrations and automation workflows. Organizations can leverage community-developed solutions to accelerate deployment and reduce customization requirements. Regular updates ensure compatibility with evolving partner platforms and new feature releases.

API Maturity and Developer Support

API capabilities determine how effectively organizations can integrate these platforms into their existing environments. Both vendors provide API access, but their documentation quality and developer support differ.

Support Services and Customer Success Programs

Post-deployment support quality significantly impacts long-term success with either platform. Both vendors offer multiple support tiers, but their approaches to customer success and ongoing relationship management vary considerably.

Versa Networks Support Structure

Versa Networks emphasizes personalized customer support and rapid response times. The company’s smaller customer base enables more individualized attention and faster issue resolution. Technical account managers maintain ongoing relationships with enterprise customers to ensure optimal platform utilization.

Support teams include engineers with deep product expertise and real-world deployment experience. Complex issues receive escalation to development teams when necessary. This direct access accelerates resolution of unusual or sophisticated technical challenges.

Customer success programs focus on maximizing value realization and identifying expansion opportunities. Regular health checks and performance reviews ensure optimal configuration and utilization. Proactive monitoring identifies potential issues before they impact operations.

Palo Alto Networks Support Offerings

Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive support services scaled to accommodate their large customer base. Multiple support tiers offer different response times and service levels based on organizational requirements. Premium support includes dedicated technical account managers and priority escalation procedures.

The company’s extensive knowledge base and community forums provide self-service support options. Regular webinars, training sessions, and user conferences keep customers informed about new features and best practices. Comprehensive documentation covers common deployment scenarios and troubleshooting procedures.

Professional services organizations assist with complex deployments and ongoing optimization. These services include architecture design, implementation assistance, and staff training programs. Specialized teams address unique requirements in regulated industries and government environments.

Response Time and Resolution Metrics

Support performance metrics reveal important differences in customer service quality between these vendors. Organizations should consider these factors when evaluating total cost of ownership and operational requirements.

• Initial Response Times: Versa Networks typically responds within 2-4 hours for critical issues
• Resolution Speed: Both vendors resolve 80% of issues within 24 hours
• Escalation Procedures: Palo Alto Networks offers more structured escalation paths
• Customer Satisfaction: Both vendors maintain satisfaction ratings above 90%

Future Roadmap and Innovation Direction

Technology roadmaps indicate how each platform will evolve to address emerging requirements and market trends. Understanding future development priorities helps organizations make strategic decisions that align with long-term business objectives.

Versa Networks Innovation Focus

Versa Networks continues investing heavily in artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities. The company’s roadmap emphasizes autonomous network operations and predictive analytics. These capabilities will enable self-healing networks that automatically optimize performance and security posture.

Zero trust network access receives ongoing development attention as organizations embrace distributed work models. Enhanced identity integration and device trust mechanisms will provide granular access control. Behavioral analytics will identify anomalous activities and automatically adjust security policies.

Edge computing integration represents a significant focus area for future platform development. Native edge connectivity will optimize application performance for Internet of Things deployments and real-time processing requirements. 5G network integration will enable seamless connectivity across diverse access technologies.

Palo Alto Networks Strategic Direction

Palo Alto Networks emphasizes platform consolidation and artificial intelligence integration across their product portfolio. The company’s strategy involves reducing complexity through unified management and automated security operations. Machine learning capabilities will enhance threat detection and policy optimization.

Cloud security integration continues expanding with enhanced container and serverless protection capabilities. Native integration with cloud provider security services will provide comprehensive protection for hybrid and multi-cloud environments. DevSecOps integration will embed security controls throughout application development lifecycles.

Extended detection and response capabilities will provide comprehensive threat hunting and incident response functionality. Integration with endpoint and cloud security tools will enable coordinated response across the entire security stack. Automated remediation will reduce the time from detection to containment.

Market Trend Adaptation

Both vendors must adapt to evolving market requirements and emerging technologies. Their ability to incorporate new capabilities while maintaining platform stability determines long-term viability.

Decision Framework and Selection Criteria

Selecting between Versa Networks and Palo Alto Networks requires careful evaluation of multiple factors. Organizations should develop structured decision frameworks that align platform capabilities with specific business requirements and constraints.

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Technical requirements form the foundation of any platform selection decision. Organizations must assess current needs while considering future growth and evolution requirements.

Security Effectiveness: Evaluate threat protection capabilities, security testing results, and compliance support features. Consider both current security posture requirements and anticipated future threats. Versa Networks’ demonstrated superiority in security testing may favor organizations prioritizing maximum protection.

Performance Requirements: Assess bandwidth needs, latency sensitivity, and application performance requirements. Consider geographic distribution and user experience expectations. Both platforms provide strong performance, but specific optimization features may favor one solution.

Scalability Needs: Evaluate growth projections and expansion plans. Consider both user count scaling and geographic expansion requirements. Cloud-native architectures typically provide better scalability for rapid growth scenarios.

Organizational Readiness Assessment

Organizational capabilities significantly impact platform selection and implementation success. Honest assessment of internal resources and expertise prevents costly deployment challenges.

• Technical Expertise: Evaluate existing network and security staff capabilities
• Change Management: Assess organizational readiness for new platform adoption
• Training Resources: Consider available time and budget for staff development
• Project Management: Evaluate internal resources for deployment coordination

Financial Considerations Beyond Initial Costs

Total cost of ownership analysis must consider multiple financial factors that extend well beyond initial licensing expenses. Organizations should model costs over typical 3-5 year planning horizons.

Hidden Costs: Consider training requirements, integration expenses, and operational overhead. Professional services costs can significantly impact total expenses, particularly for complex deployments. Factor in the cost of internal resources dedicated to deployment and ongoing management.

Risk Factors: Evaluate potential costs associated with security breaches, downtime, or performance issues. Consider the financial impact of delayed deployments or extended implementation timelines. Factor in the cost of maintaining multiple solutions versus unified platform adoption.

Final Recommendations and Strategic Considerations

The choice between Versa Networks and Palo Alto Networks depends heavily on organizational priorities, technical requirements, and resource constraints. Both platforms offer compelling capabilities, but they excel in different scenarios and use cases.

Choose Versa Networks when: Organizations prioritize rapid deployment, simplified management, and cost optimization. Companies with distributed workforces and cloud-first strategies benefit from Versa’s architecture. Mid-market organizations seeking enterprise capabilities without complexity overhead find Versa particularly attractive.

Select Palo Alto Networks when: Organizations require comprehensive security features and extensive ecosystem integrations. Large enterprises with dedicated security teams and complex compliance requirements benefit from Palo Alto’s maturity. Companies with existing Palo Alto investments can leverage unified management and policy consistency.

Consider hybrid approaches for organizations with diverse requirements or complex acquisition scenarios. Some deployment strategies may benefit from leveraging strengths from both platforms in different contexts or geographic regions.

Conclusion

Both Versa Networks and Palo Alto Networks deliver robust security and networking capabilities suitable for modern enterprise requirements. Versa Networks excels in deployment simplicity, security effectiveness, and cost optimization. Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive features, extensive integrations, and proven enterprise scalability. Success depends on aligning platform capabilities with specific organizational needs, technical constraints, and strategic objectives. Thorough evaluation using structured decision frameworks ensures optimal platform selection for long-term success.

Frequently Asked Questions: Versa Networks Vs Palo Alto Networks

Which platform offers better security effectiveness between Versa Networks and Palo Alto Networks?

Versa Networks demonstrates higher security effectiveness in independent testing, particularly for exploit blocking and evasion resistance. However, both platforms provide enterprise-grade security capabilities suitable for most organizational requirements.

What are the main cost differences between Versa SASE and Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access?

Versa Networks typically offers 20-30% lower total cost of ownership due to simplified deployment and management requirements. Palo Alto Networks provides more comprehensive features but at higher initial and ongoing costs.

Which solution is easier to deploy and manage for mid-market organizations?

Versa Networks generally requires less deployment time and specialized expertise. Their intuitive management interface and zero-touch provisioning capabilities reduce operational complexity compared to Palo Alto Networks’ more feature-rich but complex platform.

How do the SD-WAN capabilities compare between these two vendors?

Both platforms offer strong SD-WAN capabilities with different strengths. Versa Networks provides cloud-native architecture and faster deployment, while Palo Alto Networks offers tighter security integration and Microsoft 365 optimization.

What factors should organizations consider when choosing between these platforms?

Key considerations include security effectiveness requirements, deployment complexity tolerance, budget constraints, existing infrastructure investments, and internal technical expertise. Organizations should also evaluate long-term roadmap alignment with business objectives.

Which platform provides better customer support and response times?

Versa Networks typically provides more personalized support with faster response times due to their smaller customer base. Palo Alto Networks offers more structured support tiers and extensive self-service resources but may have longer response times for non-critical issues.

How do the platforms compare for global enterprise deployments?

Palo Alto Networks offers more extensive global presence and established partner relationships for large enterprise deployments. Versa Networks provides strong capabilities but may have limited local support in some regions.

What integration capabilities do these platforms offer with existing enterprise tools?

Palo Alto Networks provides more extensive third-party integrations and mature API documentation. Versa Networks focuses on core integrations with major cloud providers and essential enterprise tools, offering sufficient capabilities for most requirements.

For more detailed technical specifications and current pricing information, visit the official vendor websites: Versa Networks and Palo Alto Networks.