Zscaler Vs Versa Networks: Complete SASE Platform Comparison

Choosing the right Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solution is crucial for modern enterprises. Two leading platforms dominate this space: Zscaler and Versa Networks. Both companies offer comprehensive security and networking solutions, yet they take distinctly different approaches to SASE implementation.

This comprehensive comparison examines these platforms across multiple dimensions. We’ll analyze their security capabilities, network performance, management interfaces, and pricing structures. Additionally, we’ll explore their deployment models, integration capabilities, and customer support offerings.

Understanding these differences helps organizations make informed decisions. Each platform has unique strengths that suit different business requirements. Our analysis provides the detailed insights needed to select the optimal SASE solution for your specific needs.

Platform Architecture and Foundation

Zscaler built its platform as a cloud-native security service from the ground up. The company pioneered the cloud security market with its Zero Trust Exchange architecture. This foundation focuses primarily on security-first networking with comprehensive threat protection capabilities.

The Zscaler platform operates through a global cloud infrastructure. Over 150 data centers worldwide provide low-latency access to security services. This extensive network ensures consistent performance across geographic regions.

Versa Networks takes a different architectural approach. The company developed a unified SASE platform that natively integrates SD-WAN and security services. Unlike Zscaler’s acquired SD-WAN technologies, Versa’s solution was designed from inception as a converged platform.

This architectural difference significantly impacts deployment strategies. Versa’s native integration provides seamless management across networking and security functions. Organizations can deploy both services through a single management interface without complex integration requirements.

The platform choice affects long-term scalability and operational complexity. Zscaler’s security-first approach excels in organizations prioritizing threat protection. Versa’s unified architecture benefits enterprises requiring tight integration between networking and security operations.

Cloud Infrastructure Comparison

Zscaler’s cloud infrastructure spans six continents with redundant data centers. The platform processes over 240 billion transactions daily, demonstrating massive scale capabilities. This infrastructure supports consistent security policy enforcement regardless of user location.

Versa Networks operates a hybrid cloud model. The platform combines cloud-based management with flexible deployment options. Organizations can choose between pure cloud, on-premises, or hybrid implementations based on specific requirements.

Infrastructure resilience differs between platforms. Zscaler’s distributed architecture eliminates single points of failure through geographic redundancy. Versa’s flexible deployment model provides more control over infrastructure placement and data sovereignty.

Security Capabilities Assessment

Security effectiveness represents the core differentiator between SASE platforms. Recent CyberRatings.org testing provides objective performance metrics. Versa achieved a 99.96% protection rate in SSE and ZTNA tests, demonstrating exceptional threat detection capabilities.

Zscaler’s security stack includes advanced threat protection, data loss prevention, and cloud access security. The platform leverages machine learning algorithms trained on massive data sets. This approach enables real-time threat detection and automated response capabilities.

Both platforms implement Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) architectures. However, their implementation approaches differ significantly. Zscaler focuses on application-level access controls with granular policy enforcement. Versa integrates ZTNA capabilities within its broader SASE framework.

Advanced Threat Protection

Zscaler’s threat protection utilizes behavioral analysis and machine learning. The platform analyzes over 300 billion transactions daily to identify emerging threats. This massive data processing capability enables proactive threat detection before widespread distribution.

Inline threat inspection occurs at wire speed without performance degradation. The platform maintains threat intelligence feeds from multiple sources. Real-time updates ensure protection against zero-day exploits and advanced persistent threats.

Versa’s threat protection integrates multiple detection engines. The platform combines signature-based detection with behavioral analysis. Machine learning algorithms analyze network traffic patterns to identify suspicious activities and potential security breaches.

Sandboxing capabilities differ between platforms. Zscaler provides cloud-based sandboxing with unlimited analysis capacity. Versa offers distributed sandboxing that can operate in cloud or on-premises environments based on deployment preferences.

Network Performance and SD-WAN Capabilities

SD-WAN functionality represents a critical SASE component for most enterprises. Versa Networks built its reputation as a leading SD-WAN provider before expanding into security services. This foundation provides mature networking capabilities with comprehensive WAN optimization features.

The Versa SD-WAN platform supports dynamic path selection across multiple transport types. Organizations can utilize MPLS, broadband, LTE, and satellite connections simultaneously. Intelligent routing algorithms automatically select optimal paths based on application requirements and network conditions.

Zscaler acquired SD-WAN capabilities through strategic partnerships and acquisitions. The platform integrates with leading SD-WAN vendors to provide comprehensive SASE solutions. However, this approach requires coordination between multiple management interfaces and vendors.

Performance optimization techniques vary significantly between platforms. Versa provides native WAN optimization including data deduplication, compression, and protocol acceleration. These features reduce bandwidth consumption and improve application performance across WAN connections.

Quality of Service and Traffic Management

Versa’s QoS implementation provides granular traffic classification and prioritization. The platform supports over 3,000 predefined application signatures. Custom applications can be defined with specific performance requirements and priority levels.

Dynamic bandwidth allocation adjusts to changing network conditions. The platform monitors application performance continuously and redistributes bandwidth as needed. This ensures critical applications maintain required performance levels during network congestion.

Zscaler’s approach focuses on optimizing traffic through its global cloud network. The platform automatically routes traffic through the nearest data center. Advanced routing algorithms minimize latency and maximize throughput for all applications.

Load balancing capabilities differ between solutions. Versa provides active-active load balancing across multiple WAN links. Zscaler distributes traffic across its global infrastructure automatically without manual configuration requirements.

Management and Administration Interface Comparison

User experience significantly impacts operational efficiency and administrative overhead. Customer feedback consistently indicates that Versa SASE is easier to use and administer compared to Zscaler’s management interface. This usability advantage reduces training requirements and operational complexity.

Versa’s unified management platform controls both networking and security functions through a single interface. Administrators can configure SD-WAN policies, security rules, and monitoring parameters from one centralized location. This consolidation eliminates the need to switch between multiple management systems.

The Versa interface provides intuitive workflow management with guided configuration wizards. Complex policy deployments become simplified through step-by-step processes. Visual network topology maps help administrators understand service relationships and dependencies.

Zscaler’s management interface focuses primarily on security policy configuration. The platform provides detailed threat intelligence and reporting capabilities. However, managing integrated SD-WAN components may require additional vendor interfaces depending on deployment architecture.

Automation and Orchestration Features

Both platforms support extensive automation capabilities through APIs and scripting interfaces. Versa provides REST APIs for all management functions enabling complete automation of deployment and configuration tasks. The platform supports popular automation frameworks including Ansible and Terraform.

Policy orchestration capabilities streamline complex deployments across multiple locations. Versa’s template-based approach enables standardized configurations with location-specific customizations. Changes can be deployed simultaneously across hundreds of sites with minimal administrative effort.

Zscaler offers comprehensive APIs for security policy management and reporting. The platform integrates with popular ITSM and SOAR solutions. Automated threat response capabilities can trigger predefined actions based on security events and policy violations.

Monitoring and analytics dashboards provide real-time visibility into network and security operations. Both platforms offer customizable reporting with scheduled delivery options. Executive dashboards summarize key performance indicators for management reporting requirements.

Deployment Models and Flexibility

Deployment flexibility affects implementation timelines and operational requirements. Zscaler operates as a pure cloud service with minimal on-premises infrastructure requirements. Organizations can implement the platform quickly without significant hardware investments or data center modifications.

The Zscaler deployment model requires only lightweight connectors at branch locations. These small appliances or software agents establish secure tunnels to the nearest Zscaler data center. This approach minimizes local infrastructure while providing comprehensive security services.

Versa Networks supports multiple deployment options including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid models. Organizations can choose the deployment architecture that best fits their security, compliance, and performance requirements. This flexibility accommodates diverse enterprise needs.

On-premises deployments provide maximum control over data processing and storage. Cloud deployments offer rapid scalability and reduced operational overhead. Hybrid models combine both approaches enabling organizations to optimize for different location types and requirements.

Edge Device Requirements

Versa’s hardware requirements vary based on deployment model and performance needs. The platform supports both physical and virtual appliances. Organizations can select devices based on bandwidth requirements, user counts, and feature requirements.

Virtual appliance deployments enable rapid scaling and simplified management. Cloud-based virtual appliances can be provisioned on-demand without hardware procurement delays. This approach accelerates expansion to new locations and temporary sites.

Zscaler’s minimal hardware requirements reduce deployment complexity and costs. The platform supports various connector types including hardware appliances, virtual machines, and cloud-native integrations. Organizations can select the most appropriate option for each location.

Zero-touch provisioning capabilities streamline device deployment and configuration. Both platforms support automated configuration download and policy enforcement. Remote locations can be operational quickly without requiring on-site technical expertise.

Integration Capabilities and Ecosystem Support

Enterprise environments require extensive integration with existing security and networking infrastructure. Both platforms provide comprehensive integration capabilities, but their approaches and partnership ecosystems differ significantly.

Zscaler maintains partnerships with leading technology vendors across multiple categories. The platform integrates natively with major cloud providers, identity management systems, and security orchestration platforms. These integrations enable seamless policy enforcement and unified management.

API availability enables custom integrations with proprietary systems and specialized applications. Zscaler’s extensive documentation and developer resources support complex integration projects. The platform’s webhook capabilities enable real-time event notification to external systems.

Versa Networks provides similar integration capabilities with additional focus on networking vendor partnerships. The platform integrates with leading SD-WAN vendors, cloud providers, and telecommunications carriers. This approach enables organizations to maintain existing vendor relationships while adopting SASE capabilities.

However, one significant limitation exists with Versa’s integration capabilities. Versa SD-WAN and Zscaler solutions do not work together effectively, particularly regarding load balancing configurations. Organizations must choose one platform or the other rather than implementing hybrid solutions.

Identity and Access Management Integration

Both platforms integrate extensively with identity providers and access management systems. Zscaler supports major identity platforms including Active Directory, Azure AD, Okta, and Ping Identity. Single sign-on capabilities provide seamless user experiences across all applications.

Multi-factor authentication integration enhances security without impacting user productivity. The platform supports various authentication methods including biometrics, hardware tokens, and mobile applications. Conditional access policies can enforce additional authentication based on risk factors.

Versa’s identity integration provides similar capabilities with additional support for certificate-based authentication. The platform can leverage existing PKI infrastructure for device and user authentication. This approach satisfies compliance requirements in highly regulated industries.

User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) capabilities enhance threat detection through identity correlation. Both platforms analyze user access patterns to identify suspicious activities and potential account compromises. Machine learning algorithms establish baseline behaviors and detect anomalies automatically.

Performance Metrics and Benchmarking

Objective performance measurements provide critical insights for platform selection decisions. Independent testing organizations regularly evaluate SASE platforms across multiple performance dimensions including throughput, latency, and threat detection effectiveness.

Recent CyberRatings.org evaluations demonstrated Versa’s superior performance in speed, security, and threat protection compared to Zscaler. These results indicate Versa’s platform efficiency in processing security policies without significant performance degradation.

Throughput measurements vary significantly based on security policy complexity and enabled features. SSL inspection, advanced threat protection, and data loss prevention all impact overall performance. Both platforms provide performance optimization options to balance security and speed requirements.

Latency measurements consider both processing delays and geographic proximity to service points. Zscaler’s extensive global infrastructure minimizes geographic latency for most user populations. Versa’s flexible deployment options enable organizations to optimize latency through strategic appliance placement.

Scalability and Capacity Planning

Zscaler’s cloud architecture provides virtually unlimited scalability without capacity planning requirements. The platform automatically scales resources based on demand patterns and usage growth. Organizations can expand user populations and geographic coverage without infrastructure investments.

Bandwidth scaling occurs transparently through Zscaler’s global infrastructure. The platform distributes traffic loads across multiple data centers automatically. This approach ensures consistent performance during peak usage periods and traffic spikes.

Versa’s scalability depends on deployment architecture and hardware selections. On-premises deployments require capacity planning for anticipated growth. Cloud deployments provide more flexibility but may require configuration adjustments for significant scaling events.

Performance monitoring capabilities help organizations optimize resource utilization and identify scaling requirements. Both platforms provide detailed analytics on throughput, session counts, and resource consumption patterns. Proactive monitoring prevents performance degradation during growth periods.

Customer Reviews and Market Reception

Customer feedback provides valuable insights into real-world platform experiences beyond vendor marketing materials. Review aggregation platforms collect feedback from actual users across different industries and deployment scenarios.

Versa Networks maintains a 4.8-star rating with 199 reviews, while Zscaler holds a 4.6-star rating with 1,121 reviews. The higher rating for Versa suggests strong customer satisfaction, though Zscaler’s larger review volume indicates broader market adoption.

Customer feedback consistently highlights Versa’s ease of use and administration. Organizations appreciate the unified management interface and simplified policy configuration. The platform’s intuitive design reduces training requirements and operational complexity.

Zscaler receives praise for its comprehensive security capabilities and global infrastructure. Customers value the platform’s threat intelligence and advanced protection features. However, some reviews mention complexity in managing integrated SD-WAN components from multiple vendors.

Industry-Specific Feedback

Financial services organizations often prefer Versa’s on-premises deployment options for regulatory compliance. The platform’s flexibility enables organizations to maintain data sovereignty while implementing SASE capabilities. Compliance reporting features satisfy audit requirements in regulated industries.

Healthcare organizations appreciate both platforms’ security capabilities for protecting sensitive patient data. HIPAA compliance features and audit logging support regulatory requirements. Data loss prevention capabilities prevent unauthorized disclosure of protected health information.

Manufacturing companies often choose Versa for its industrial network support and OT security capabilities. The platform’s SD-WAN features optimize connectivity between manufacturing sites and cloud applications. Quality of service capabilities ensure critical applications maintain required performance levels.

Technology companies frequently select Zscaler for its cloud-native architecture and developer-friendly APIs. The platform’s extensive integration capabilities support DevOps workflows and automated deployment processes. Advanced threat protection safeguards intellectual property and sensitive development resources.

Pricing Models and Total Cost of Ownership

Understanding pricing structures and total cost of ownership (TCO) is crucial for budget planning and vendor selection. Both platforms offer subscription-based pricing with different approaches to feature bundling and capacity allocation.

Zscaler’s pricing model typically bundles security services with user-based licensing. Organizations pay per user per month for comprehensive security capabilities. Additional features like advanced threat protection and data loss prevention may require higher-tier subscriptions.

The cloud-based architecture eliminates hardware costs and reduces operational expenses. Organizations avoid capital expenditures for security appliances and infrastructure. However, bandwidth costs for tunneling all traffic through Zscaler’s cloud may impact total expenses.

Versa Networks offers more flexible pricing options including both user-based and bandwidth-based models. Organizations can select the pricing approach that best aligns with their usage patterns and budget constraints. On-premises deployments require hardware investments but provide predictable operational costs.

TCO calculations must consider implementation costs, training requirements, and ongoing operational expenses. Versa’s unified management may reduce administrative overhead compared to multi-vendor SASE implementations. However, on-premises deployments require additional IT resources for maintenance and support.

Hidden Costs and Budget Considerations

Professional services costs for implementation and configuration vary between platforms. Zscaler’s cloud deployment typically requires minimal professional services for basic implementations. Complex deployments with extensive customization may require additional consulting support.

Training costs depend on platform complexity and existing staff expertise. Versa’s intuitive interface may reduce training requirements compared to more complex security platforms. However, both platforms require initial training for optimal utilization and policy management.

Bandwidth costs represent a significant consideration for cloud-based SASE implementations. Tunneling all traffic through cloud security services increases bandwidth consumption. Organizations should factor these costs into TCO calculations, particularly for high-bandwidth locations.

Licensing complexity can impact ongoing administrative costs. Some platforms require separate licenses for different features or user types. Unified licensing models simplify procurement and reduce administrative overhead for license management.

Support Services and Professional Services

Quality support services significantly impact platform success and user satisfaction. Both vendors provide comprehensive support options, but their approaches and service levels differ based on subscription tiers and deployment complexity.

Zscaler offers multiple support tiers with varying response times and service levels. Premium support includes dedicated technical account managers and priority escalation procedures. The vendor’s global support organization provides 24/7 assistance across all time zones.

Customer feedback indicates that Versa SASE is easier to do business with compared to other vendors. This suggests streamlined procurement processes, responsive sales support, and flexible commercial terms. Positive business relationships contribute to long-term partnership success.

Professional services capabilities help organizations maximize platform value through optimal implementation and configuration. Both vendors offer consulting services for complex deployments, migration planning, and optimization projects.

Documentation quality and training resources affect user adoption and operational efficiency. Comprehensive documentation reduces support requirements and enables self-service problem resolution. Online training platforms provide flexible learning options for technical staff.

Implementation and Migration Support

Migration from existing security infrastructure requires careful planning and execution. Both vendors provide migration services and tools to simplify transitions from legacy platforms. Automated migration tools can transfer policies and configurations when possible.

Phased rollout strategies minimize business disruption during implementation. Organizations can implement SASE capabilities gradually across different locations and user populations. This approach enables validation and optimization before full deployment.

Post-implementation optimization services help organizations fine-tune policies and configurations. Performance monitoring and analysis identify opportunities for improvement. Regular health checks ensure platforms operate efficiently and meet performance requirements.

Change management support addresses organizational challenges beyond technical implementation. User training, communication planning, and stakeholder engagement contribute to successful platform adoption. Comprehensive change management reduces resistance and accelerates time-to-value.

Compliance and Regulatory Considerations

Regulatory compliance represents a critical requirement for many organizations, particularly in highly regulated industries. Both platforms provide compliance features, but their approaches to data protection, audit logging, and regulatory reporting differ significantly.

Zscaler’s cloud architecture includes compliance certifications for major regulatory frameworks. The platform maintains SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP authorizations. These certifications demonstrate commitment to security controls and operational excellence.

Data residency requirements pose challenges for global cloud services. Zscaler provides regional data centers to address data sovereignty concerns. Organizations can configure policies to ensure data processing occurs within specific geographic regions.

Versa Networks’ flexible deployment options provide greater control over compliance requirements. On-premises deployments enable organizations to maintain complete control over data processing and storage. This approach simplifies compliance in highly regulated environments.

Audit logging and reporting capabilities support compliance documentation and regulatory submissions. Both platforms provide comprehensive logs of user activities, policy changes, and security events. Automated reporting reduces manual effort for compliance documentation.

Industry-Specific Compliance Features

Financial services organizations require specific compliance features for regulations like PCI DSS and SOX. Both platforms provide capabilities for securing payment card data and maintaining transaction integrity. Detailed audit logs support compliance reporting and examination requirements.

Healthcare compliance involves HIPAA requirements for protecting patient health information. Both platforms provide features for securing PHI transmission and storage. Business associate agreements ensure appropriate protection of healthcare data in cloud environments.

Government organizations require FedRAMP authorized solutions for cloud deployments. Zscaler maintains FedRAMP Moderate authorization enabling government use. Versa’s on-premises options may be preferred for classified or highly sensitive government applications.

International organizations must navigate varying regulatory requirements across different countries. Both platforms provide features for addressing GDPR, privacy regulations, and data protection requirements in multiple jurisdictions.

Future Roadmap and Innovation Trajectory

Technology roadmaps indicate vendor commitment to innovation and platform evolution. Both companies continue investing in research and development to address emerging threats and market requirements.

Zscaler’s roadmap emphasizes artificial intelligence and machine learning enhancements. The company invests heavily in behavioral analytics and automated threat response capabilities. Cloud-native innovations leverage massive data processing capabilities for improved threat detection.

Zero Trust architecture evolution continues expanding beyond network access to include device trust, application security, and data protection. Integrated approaches provide comprehensive security across all digital assets and interactions.

Versa Networks focuses on expanding SASE capabilities while maintaining its unified platform approach. Recent investments in security testing demonstrate commitment to competitive threat protection capabilities. The company’s AAA rating achievements indicate successful innovation in core security functions.

Both vendors recognize the growing importance of edge computing and IoT security. Roadmap investments address securing distributed computing environments and non-traditional network devices. These capabilities become increasingly important as organizations adopt edge computing architectures.

Emerging Technology Integration

Artificial intelligence integration enhances both platforms’ capabilities for threat detection and automated response. Machine learning algorithms analyze vast amounts of network data to identify subtle attack patterns. Automated response capabilities can implement countermeasures without human intervention.

Cloud-native development continues expanding platform capabilities and improving performance. Containerized architectures enable rapid feature deployment and scaling. Microservices approaches provide flexibility for customization and integration with emerging technologies.

5G network integration represents a significant opportunity for SASE platforms. Both vendors are developing capabilities to leverage 5G performance and edge computing capabilities. These enhancements will enable new use cases and improved user experiences.

Quantum computing preparation involves developing quantum-resistant encryption and security protocols. Both platforms are investing in research to ensure long-term security against quantum computing threats. Early preparation provides competitive advantages for security-conscious organizations.

Making the Right Choice: Decision Framework

Selecting between Zscaler and Versa Networks requires careful consideration of organizational requirements, existing infrastructure, and strategic objectives. Both platforms excel in different areas and suit different organizational profiles.

Organizations prioritizing comprehensive security capabilities and global reach may prefer Zscaler’s cloud-native approach. The platform’s extensive threat intelligence and proven security track record appeal to security-focused enterprises. Rapid deployment and minimal infrastructure requirements support aggressive implementation timelines.

Enterprises requiring unified networking and security management may find Versa’s integrated platform more suitable. The platform’s native SASE architecture eliminates integration complexity between networking and security functions. Superior performance metrics and ease of administration provide operational advantages.

Existing infrastructure investments influence platform selection decisions. Organizations with significant SD-WAN investments may prefer Versa’s networking-centric approach. Companies prioritizing cloud transformation may align better with Zscaler’s cloud-first architecture.

Regulatory requirements and compliance needs affect deployment model preferences. Highly regulated organizations may require Versa’s on-premises deployment options. Companies comfortable with cloud services can benefit from Zscaler’s global cloud infrastructure.

Evaluation Criteria Prioritization

• Security Effectiveness: Both platforms provide strong security capabilities with different architectural approaches
• Ease of Management: Versa’s unified interface provides administrative advantages for complex deployments
• Performance: Recent testing shows Versa’s superior performance in speed and threat protection
• Scalability: Zscaler’s cloud architecture offers unlimited scaling without capacity planning
• Integration: Both platforms provide extensive integration capabilities with different ecosystem strengths
• Cost: TCO varies significantly based on deployment architecture and organizational requirements

Proof of concept implementations provide valuable insights for final decision making. Both vendors support evaluation deployments enabling hands-on testing with real traffic and policies. Objective performance measurements during evaluation periods inform selection decisions.

Stakeholder input from security, networking, and operations teams ensures comprehensive evaluation. Different teams may have varying priorities and requirements that influence platform selection. Collaborative evaluation processes build consensus and support for implementation decisions.

Conclusion

Both Zscaler and Versa Networks offer compelling SASE solutions with distinct advantages. Versa’s unified architecture and superior performance metrics make it ideal for organizations seeking integrated networking and security management. Zscaler’s cloud-native approach and extensive global infrastructure suit enterprises prioritizing rapid deployment and comprehensive threat protection. The choice ultimately depends on specific organizational requirements, existing infrastructure, and strategic objectives.

Frequently Asked Questions About Zscaler Vs Versa Networks

Common Questions About SASE Platform Selection

• Which platform provides better threat protection capabilities?
  Recent CyberRatings.org testing shows Versa achieving 99.96% protection rate, outperforming Zscaler in speed, security, and threat protection metrics. Both platforms offer strong security capabilities but with different architectural approaches.
• Can Zscaler and Versa Networks be used together?
  No, there is a significant compatibility issue between Versa SD-WAN and Zscaler solutions, particularly with load balancing configurations. Organizations must choose one platform rather than implementing hybrid solutions.
• Which platform is easier to manage and administer?
  Customer reviews consistently indicate that Versa SASE is easier to use and administer compared to Zscaler. Versa’s unified management interface controls both networking and security functions through a single platform.
• What are the main differences in deployment options?
  Zscaler operates as a pure cloud service requiring minimal on-premises infrastructure. Versa Networks supports multiple deployment models including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid options, providing greater flexibility for compliance requirements.
• How do the platforms compare in terms of customer satisfaction?
  Versa Networks maintains a 4.8-star rating with 199 reviews, while Zscaler holds a 4.6-star rating with 1,121 reviews. Versa shows higher customer satisfaction, though Zscaler has broader market adoption based on review volume.
• Which platform offers better SD-WAN capabilities?
  Versa Networks built its reputation as a leading SD-WAN provider with native networking capabilities. Unlike Zscaler’s acquired SD-WAN technologies, Versa’s unified SASE offerings provide seamless integration between networking and security functions.
• What are the key considerations for total cost of ownership?
  Zscaler’s cloud model eliminates hardware costs but may increase bandwidth expenses. Versa’s flexible pricing includes user-based and bandwidth-based options, with on-premises deployments requiring hardware investments but providing predictable operational costs.
• Which industries benefit most from each platform?
  Financial services and healthcare organizations often prefer Versa’s on-premises deployment options for regulatory compliance. Technology companies frequently choose Zscaler for its cloud-native architecture and extensive APIs supporting DevOps workflows.

References:

Versa Networks CyberRatings.org Test Results

G2 Platform Comparison Reviews